1. Who pays for schooling?
Taxpayers of Australia are giving $26 billion each year for the schooling of children.
This money is being badly spent.
The way our schools are funded:
(1) distributes money unfairly
(2) denies parents rights
(3) lowers educational standards, and
(4) reinforces social classes.
2. Who goes to which schools?
Australian children go to:
(1) State-run schools 68%
(2) Catholic schools 20%
(3) Independent schools 12%.
Each sector of schools has
(1) rich children
(2) average children
(3) poor children.
Most families earning less than $500/wk use state schools.
And most families earning over $1500/wk also use state schools.
3.Who gets what funding?
Where the tax money goes:
The biggest sector gets the most tax dollars per child.
$14,000 for every
State school place
$10,000 for every
Catholic school place
$6,500 for the average
Independent school place
The smallest sector gets the least tax dollars per child.
This system is not based on need. It is based on protecting systems.
4. What should happen
Where the tax money should go:
|HIGHEST for lowest income children||MEDIUM for medium income children||LOWEST for highest income children|
OUR SYSTEM IS UNJUST
A child’s education in Australia today is funded, not according to family income, but according to WHO RUNS THE SCHOOL.
The biggest sector (State) has the biggest clout and grabs the biggest amount per child.
5. Punishing free choice
If an average-income parent chooses an Independent school for their child, instead of a State-run school, they automatically lose most of their child’s funding.
Parents are unfairly being denied the right to choose who shall teach their children.
Thousands of families are coerced by this biased funding into State-run schools.
6. Captive customers
The school funding system holds many families captive in state-run schools. Many parents cannot change to another sector if they believe the teaching standards are better elsewhere.
Thus the least advantaged children are concentrated by the funding system into one sector. This makes it harder for state teachers and state students.
A parents’ right to choose their child’s school is the single most powerful factor in raising the standards of education.
7. Reinforcing the class system
DENIAL of OPPORTUNITY
Education is the greatest social instrument for freeing children from socio-economic disadvantage.
The present system forcibly herds lower-income children into State-run schools, thus REINFORCING the class system – that is, the inheriting of disadvantage.
Question. Why do we have such an unfair system?
Answer. The state system operators lobby hard to maintain their empire.
8. The propaganda machine
State school teachers work hard – harder than they should have to, because their masters force an unnatural concentration of less-advantaged students upon them.
But the state system operators, (the state unions, bureaucrats and academics), pump out a never-ending stream of misleading articles in the media, all designed to convince the public that they are actually protecting the disadvantaged children. A cruel hoax.
9. The fair solution
WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
The solution is to:
(1) fund each child according to family income, and
(2) let parents choose who shall educate their child.
(1) Financial justice recognizing need
(2) Democratic rights of families
(3) Progress in education standards
(4) More opportunities for children.
The “SES” funding scheme used with non-government schools is a step in the right direction.
10. What is the SES scheme?
What is the SES funding scheme?
It means funding for each child is based on the socio-economic status (SES) of where the child lives.
This is the first time school funding has been based on actual student needs, rather than assumptions about “school” wealth.
But the SES funding principle is only applied within the Independent sector. The poorest Independent students are still granted at most 70% of a rich student’s (or any student’s) allotment in a state-run school.
11. One small step
The SES funding scheme is a small, modest step in the right direction.
It grants to the highest-income Independent school families only 13.5% of the amount paid for every student in the state school system.
State-run schools are funded at the highest level for every student.
State-system operators claim to be socialists. But the SES scheme is more socialist than they are – because for the first time it distributes taxpayer’s money for schooling according to family means.
12. Who owns the poor?
COMBATTING the PROPAGANDA 1
Question 1. But doesn’t the existing funding system look after the lower-income children?
Answer. No, it financially locks them in to State-run schooling. It makes it harder for them to have any choice.
In fact, most non-state schools would gladly take lower-income children without charging ANY FEES AT ALL – if they received the normal State-school funding grant for that child.
13. Guarantor or provider?
COMBATTING the PROPAGANDA 2
Question 2. But doesn’t the Government have a duty to see that every child, even the poorest, gets a decent education?
Answer. Yes, it does. But it does not follow that a government department has to personally deliver this service. Indeed, other providers generally do a better job.
In fact by financially coercing lower-income families into State-run education, they create an artificial concentration of the disadvantaged.
14. Deceit in the media
COMBATTING the PROPAGANDA 3
Question 3. But what about reports that independent schools, sometimes called “private” schools, are getting more taxpayers’ money than State-run schools?
Answer. These are lies, designed to conceal the present desperately unjust channeling of taxpayers’ money to selected beneficiaries – at the expense of children’s prospects.
If lies are repeated often enough in the mass media, the population tends to believe them.
15. Defending democracy
COMBATTING the PROPAGANDA 4
Question 4. Wouldn’t it be fairer if every child went to a state school, thus eliminating all difference in opportunity?
No. Education standards would fall because there would be no competition. And democracy would suffer. Parents’ rights would be denied.
An all-powerful state system would have free run, disseminating its own biased political values even more than now. This would no longer be a free country.
16. Choices entails diversity
COMBATTING the PROPAGANDA 5
Question 5. Why are you hostile to state schooling?
Answer. I am not.I welcome all styles of schooling. There are many great state schools. I believe in a parent’s right of choice. There is no choice without diversity.
Indeed, if the state school system were competing fairly with other schools, there is no doubt that the average standard of service in state schools would quickly improve.